The California Senate has approved Assembly-passed bills allowing small marijuana growers to sell their products directly to consumers at state-organized farmers markets and to legalize cannabis cafes in the state.
On Tuesday, senators voted 27-5 to advance the marijuana farmers markets measure from Assemblymember Gail Pellerin (D). Members also approved the cannabis cafe proposal from Assemblymember Matt Haney (D) in a 30-7 vote.
The former bill would also allows on-site cannabis consumption at approved events. If enacted, however, the law would not mean that small cultivators could freely market their products alongside other traditional vendors selling fruits and vegetables at traditional farmers markets, for example, unless there was local and state regulatory approval to sell marijuana at a specialized area.
The bill cleared the Assembly in late May with nearly unanimous support before moving to the Senate, where it passed through two committees. It will still need to go back to the Assembly for concurrence on Senate amendments.
Under the proposal, the Department of Cannabis Control (DCC) would be authorized to issue “a state temporary event license to a licensee authorizing onsite cannabis sales to, and consumption by, persons 21 years of age or older at certain venues expressly approved by a local jurisdiction, as specified,” the bill text says.
Local jurisdictions would need to consent to allowing the events in order for a license to be granted.
“As a farmer’s daughter, knowing the importance of having that direct relationship with the consumer, this allows cannabis farmers to be able to sell at authorized events—cannabis directly to the sellers—bringing the stock right to the person,” Sen. Susan Talamantes Eggman (D) said on the floor.
Applicants wishing to obtain the state temporary events license would also need to meet the definition of a small marijuana producer. That means they could not be cultivating more than one acre of cannabis, 22,000 square feet under a mixed-light tier 1 cultivation license or 5,000 square feet under a mixed-light tier 2 or indoor cultivation license.
This would expand upon a California law that was enacted in 2018, allowing regulators to issue temporary marijuana event licenses in jurisdictions where the local government permits it.
It was that policy change that allowed marijuana sales and on-site consumption at the California State Fair for the first time this year. Under that policy, approved retailers could market their cannabis, whereas this latest legislation would extend that to small cultivators that received the necessary license.
Meanwhile, Haney’s separate cannabis cafe bill that also passed the Senate this week would allow on-site marijuana consumption at licensed businesses that could also offer non-cannabis food and non-alcoholic drinks and host live events such as concerts if they get permission from their local government.
Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) vetoed the prior version, saying that while he appreciated that the intent was to “provide cannabis retailers with increased business opportunities and an avenue to attract new customers,” he felt “concerned this bill could undermine California’s long-standing smoke-free workplace protections.”
To that end, the new measure contains changes to create separation between public consumption spaces and back rooms of businesses where food is prepared or stored in order to better protection the health of workers in line with the governor’s concerns.
The bill was further amended in the Senate to make it so local jurisdictions would need to consider whether they’re requiring “adequate ventilation and filtration systems.” It was also revised to stipulate that employees can wear masks, including N95 coverings, without penalty. Employers would be required to pay for those masks.
Additionally, the legislation was amended to specifically prohibit loitering around the cannabis cafe, with licensees being responsible for ensuring that steps are taken to prevent such loitering.
Sen. Ben Allen (D) said on the floor prior to Tuesday’s vote that current law allowing on-site cannabis consumption lounges but banning the sale of food and beverages at such premises “has created costly and cumbersome workarounds to provide their guests with the expected experience by either taking out two property leases or having food items delivered in from outside vendors.”
The measure, which will also need to go back to the Assembly for concurrence on recent changes, would also allow local governments to decide whether to allow cannabis cafes to operate instead of automatically legalizing them statewide.
The bill makes explicitly clear that hemp-based food items or drinks are not considered “non-cannabis” products that could be sold at the cafes. It also says that non-cannabis items “shall be stored and displayed separately and distinctly from all cannabis and cannabis products present on the premises.”
The legislation would also allow live musical or other performances on the premises of a cannabis retailer in areas where on-site consumption is allowed.
There have been examples of California businesses that have found workarounds to permit on-site consumption while making food available to guests—but they’ve operated in a grey area, partnering with separately licensed restaurants that receive the profits.
—
Marijuana Moment is tracking more than 1,500 cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they don’t miss any developments.
Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access.
—
Meanwhile in California, a state-funded effort is underway to analyze the genetic information of various marijuana strains in order to preserve the state’s rich history of cannabis cultivation. It’s part of a project meant not only to acknowledge the past but also protect the future of legacy growing regions such as the Emerald Triangle.
Separately, a plan from the governor that would have ushered in sweeping changes to the state’s marijuana and hemp markets died earlier this month after a Senate committee did not call the bill for a vote ahead of a key legislative deadline.
The measure would have folded hemp-derived cannabinoid products into the state’s regulated marijuana system and opened the door to out-of-state hemp producers to sell products into California’s cannabis market. It was an attempt to rein in largely unregulated hemp-derived cannabinoid products and smokable hemp flower, but it received sharp pushback from industry groups including Origins Council as well as some medical patients who said they rely on hemp-derived CBD.
Marijuana Moment is made possible with support from readers. If you rely on our cannabis advocacy journalism to stay informed, please consider a monthly Patreon pledge.
